• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
You are here: Home / Employee Relations / Slaw: Could cellphone use constitute electronic presence at crime?

By Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor | < 1 Minute Read May 24, 2012

Slaw: Could cellphone use constitute electronic presence at crime?

The National Post recently presented the interesting case in which a New Jersey judge must decide whether someone can be “electronically present” in a car, even if they physically aren’t there, and, if so, whether the person can be held liable for events that take place, or that are caused by their electronic presence.

Put another way, if a person sends a text message to a person who is driving, and the driver gets into a vehicle collision, can others involved in the incident sue the sender of the message for distracting the driver?

For more, read my latest post on Slaw.

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor
Managing Editor at First Reference Inc.
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B., is a trained lawyer called to the Quebec bar in 1988 and is still a member in good standing. She practiced business, employment and labour law until 1999. For over 20 years, Yosie has been the Managing Editor at First Reference. She manages the PolicyPro Human Resources and Internal Controls editions, The Human Resources Advisor editions, PaySource and the HRinfodesk news service as well as the blogs. Marie-Yosie (a.k.a. Yosie) is a recognized and respected author, with an extensive background in human resources, employment and labour across the country.
Follow me
Latest posts by Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor (see all)
  • A new version of form T3010 is coming in January 2024 - November 24, 2023
  • Ontario introduces Bill 79, Working for Workers Act, 2023 - March 29, 2023
  • Call for a ban on NDAs in certain cases - March 1, 2023

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Mastodon

Article by Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor / Employee Relations, Health and Safety / ban on cellphone use, cellphone use, Distracted driving, the Traffic Safety (Distracted Driving) Amendment Act, vicarious liability

The Essential HR Policy Guide Banner

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor

Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B., is a trained lawyer called to the Quebec bar in 1988 and is still a member in good standing. She practiced business, employment and labour law until 1999. For over 20 years, Yosie has been the Managing Editor at First Reference. She manages the PolicyPro Human Resources and Internal Controls editions, The Human Resources Advisor editions, PaySource and the HRinfodesk news service as well as the blogs. Marie-Yosie (a.k.a. Yosie) is a recognized and respected author, with an extensive background in human resources, employment and labour across the country.

Comments

  1. Yosie Saint-Cyr says

    May 27, 2012 at 6:51 pm

    This is an update to my recent post: Could Cellphone Use Constitute Electronic Presence at Crime?

    http://www.slaw.ca/2012/05/26/sender-of-the-text-message-not-liable-for-car-crash-judge-says/

  2. Collin McGuirk says

    May 24, 2012 at 4:21 pm

    There are a couple of things wrong with this…First, how can the sender know that the recipient is driving? Second, it is the recipient’s choice to answer the text or call when it is unsafe to do so. The responsibility should rest solely with the recipient.

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy