The National Post recently presented the interesting case in which a New Jersey judge must decide whether someone can be “electronically present” in a car, even if they physically aren’t there, and, if so, whether the person can be held liable for events that take place, or that are caused by their electronic presence.
Put another way, if a person sends a text message to a person who is driving, and the driver gets into a vehicle collision, can others involved in the incident sue the sender of the message for distracting the driver?
For more, read my latest post on Slaw.
Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor
Managing Editor at First Reference Inc.
Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B., is a trained lawyer called to the Quebec bar in 1988 and is still a member in good standing. She practiced business, employment and labour law until 1999. For over 20 years, Yosie has been the Managing Editor at First Reference. She manages the PolicyPro collection, The Human Resources Advisor editions and the HRinfodesk news service as well as the blogs. Yosie is one of Canada’s best known and most respected HR authors, with an extensive background in employment and labour across the country. Read more
Latest posts by Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor (see all)
- Amid COVID-19, take time on April 28 to mark Day of Mourning - April 24, 2020
- Three popular articles this week on HRinfodesk - April 23, 2020
- CEWS (75 percent wage subsidy) available Monday, April 27, 2020 - April 21, 2020
This is an update to my recent post: Could Cellphone Use Constitute Electronic Presence at Crime?
http://www.slaw.ca/2012/05/26/sender-of-the-text-message-not-liable-for-car-crash-judge-says/
There are a couple of things wrong with this…First, how can the sender know that the recipient is driving? Second, it is the recipient’s choice to answer the text or call when it is unsafe to do so. The responsibility should rest solely with the recipient.