• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 24th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference 📣
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
You are here: Home / Business / Third time the charm for copyright reform?

By Adam Gorley | 2 Minutes Read November 1, 2011

Third time the charm for copyright reform?

In the coming weeks, the federal government will make its fourth attempt in six years to reform copyright law for the digital age, having recently introduced Bill C-11, An Act to amend the Copyright Act, also known as the Copyright Modernization Act. (The last copyright amendments happened in 1997, long, long before copyright piracy entered the mainstream.) However, it is only the third attempt since the Conservative Party has been in power. Will this be their lucky time? The current bill is essentially the same as the previous effort, Bill C-32, which was thwarted after its second reading when the government fell earlier this year on a non-confidence motion. The newly elected government promised to reintroduce the amendments and pass them in short order, and here we are.
The Copyright Modernization Act would make significant changes to the way we use and interact with copyrighted content. For one thing, it would explicitly legalize much of users’ already common behaviour, but place strict limits on that behaviour. For example, the law would give users the rights to:

  • Copy content between devices, e.g., from a compact disc to a computer or a portable music player, and to make backup copies, unless restricted by a digital lock.
  • Record broadcasts from television, radio and the Internet to enjoy at a later time on the device of the user’s choice. Users would not be allowed to record “on-demand” content (e.g., streaming video or radio) or content protected by digital locks. Moreover, users could not record content to use for commercial purposes, e.g., to rebroadcast for profit.
  • Use copyrighted materials for the purposes of education, satire or parody. This is commonly called “fair use”.
  • Use a publicly available copyrighted work to create a new work, provided that the user doesn’t profit from the new work, that the new work doesn’t have an adverse effect on the original copyright holder’s ability to profit from the original work, and that the new work doesn’t damage the original copyright holder’s reputation. This provision would allow musical artists, for example, to sample other artists’ music in their new works, but not to sell those new songs.
  • Make copies of copyrighted class materials transmitted electronically to use during a course in which the user is enrolled. The law would require teachers and students to destroy all digital copies of course materials within 30 days of the completion of the course.

The government’s website dedicated to the copyright modernization efforts is BalancedCopyright.gc.ca. But despite the name, you’re not going to find balanced coverage there. I recommend law professor and copyright expert Michael Geist’s blog for a critical look at the proposed amendments, as well as constructive alternative suggestions. You can read my assessment of Bill C-11 on HRinfodesk.com (subscription required).
Let us know how copyright affects your business, and how the new law would change the way you operate.
Adam Gorley
First Reference Internal Controls, Human Resources and Compliance Editor

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Adam Gorley
Editor at First Reference Inc.
Adam Gorley is a copywriter, editor and researcher at First Reference. He regularly contributes to First Reference Talks, Inside Internal Controls and other First Reference publications. He writes about general HR issues, accessibility, privacy, technology in the workplace, accommodation, violence and harassment, internal controls and more.
Follow me
Latest posts by Adam Gorley (see all)
  • Can you implement a mandatory vaccine policy or ask employees if they have been vaccinated? - June 10, 2021
  • Do you know the latest on terminations? Find out at the Ontario Virtual Employment Law Conference - May 11, 2021
  • Announcing the 2021 Virtual Ontario Employment Law Conference - April 15, 2021

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window)

Article by Adam Gorley / Business, Finance and Accounting / An Act to amend the Copyright Act, backup copies, Bill C-11, copyright, Copyright Act, Copyright infringement, Copyright Modernization Act, copyright reform, course materials, digital locks, digital media, digital rights management, DRM, fair use, Michael Geist, on-demand, portable music player, rebroadcast for profit, reputation, streaming

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Adam Gorley

Adam Gorley is a copywriter, editor and researcher at First Reference. He regularly contributes to First Reference Talks, Inside Internal Controls and other First Reference publications. He writes about general HR issues, accessibility, privacy, technology in the workplace, accommodation, violence and harassment, internal controls and more.

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy