• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Business / Canada loses points in annual corruption ranking

By Adam Gorley | 3 Minutes Read February 18, 2014

Canada loses points in annual corruption ranking

Transparency International’s 2013 Corruption Perceptions Index shows significant improvement among some poor performers and some movement at the top, as well. In particular, Canada’s score fell three points in 2013, to 81 (out of 100). The Corruption Perceptions Index measures how various stakeholders perceive corruption in the public sectors of the subject countries, based on reviews of government accountability, access to information, conflicts of interest and abuse of office, and integrity rules and anti-corruption laws.

A number of factors likely played a role in the reduction in Canada’s score in 2013, despite it remaining among the top 10 countries.
The Charbonneau Commission in Quebec brought to light substantial corruption in that province’s public service—and continues to expose abuses. Three mayors, including two in Montreal, resigned due to allegations of corruption. Some individuals who have testified before the commission have suggested that the corruption is just as bad in Ontario.
Spending, accountability and access-to-information scandals plagued Canada’s federal government in 2013, including ongoing allegations of election fraud and one conviction, inappropriate spending claims by government ministers and senators, and continuing failures to produce requested information in a timely manner. Indeed, a 2010 study found Canada fared poorly with respect to freedom of information, compared to Commonwealth nations Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and the United Kingdom.
The top-ranked countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index were:

  • Denmark and New Zealand (tied at number 1, with scores of 91/100)
  • Finland and Sweden (tied at 3, scores 89)
  • Norway and Singapore (tied at 5, scores 86)
  • Switzerland (7, score 85)
  • the Netherlands (8, score 83)
  • Australia and Canada (tied at 9, scores 81)

The lowest-ranked countries were:

  • Somalia, North Korea and Afghanistan (tied at number 175, with scores of 8/100)
  • Sudan (174, score 11)
  • South Sudan (173, score 14)
  • Libya (172, score 15)
  • Iraq (171, score 16)
  • Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Syria (168, scores 17)

While the Corruption Perceptions Index only examines corruption in the public service, the issue remains relevant for private enterprises. As the Charbonneau Commission demonstrates, corrupt public servants do not work in a vacuum. They are often willing partners or accomplices to private businesses or individuals. In other words, private sector organizations also have to take a close look at their governance and operations to ensure they are not engaged in corrupt activities. And as corruption in the public sector declines, it becomes even more important to run a clean private business, as those that remain corrupt, or are perceived to be corrupt, become less attractive for public contracts. Corrupt organizations also lose public trust and may miss out on general business opportunities. Such lost opportunities may appear as a mere blip for banks and financial institutions, but for smaller businesses, they can be the difference between success and failure.

Finance and Accounting PolicyPro

Finance and Accounting PolicyPro

Policies and procedures are essential to communicating internal controls but it takes a lot of work to create and maintain them. Finance & Accounting PolicyPro can save you a significant amount of time to draft and update your policies. FAPP offers over 140 sample policies, procedures and authoritative commentary in the areas of finance, corporate governance, operations and marketing.

learn more
  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Adam Gorley
Editor at First Reference Inc.
Adam Gorley is a copywriter, editor and researcher at First Reference. He contributes regularly to First Reference Talks, Inside Internal Controls and other First Reference publications. He writes about general HR issues, accessibility, privacy, technology in the workplace, accommodation, violence and harassment, internal controls and more.
Follow me
Latest posts by Adam Gorley (see all)
  • Can you implement a mandatory vaccine policy or ask employees if they have been vaccinated? - June 10, 2021
  • Do you know the latest on terminations? Find out at the Ontario Virtual Employment Law Conference - May 11, 2021
  • Announcing the 2021 Virtual Ontario Employment Law Conference - April 15, 2021

Article by Adam Gorley / Business, Finance and Accounting, Not for Profit / abuse of office, access to information, accountability, anti-corruption law, Charbonneau Commission, conflict of interest, corporate governance and accountability, corruption, corruption in public service, Corruption Perceptions Index, election fraud, government accountability, integrity rules, ontario, perceived corruption, public-sector corruption, Quebec, spending scandal, Transparency International

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About Adam Gorley

Adam Gorley is a copywriter, editor and researcher at First Reference. He contributes regularly to First Reference Talks, Inside Internal Controls and other First Reference publications. He writes about general HR issues, accessibility, privacy, technology in the workplace, accommodation, violence and harassment, internal controls and more.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2022 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy