• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Payroll / How exceptional – severance and long notice periods

By Vey Willetts LLP | 3 Minutes Read April 11, 2022

How exceptional – severance and long notice periods

severance and notice periods

It is a well-established principle of Ontario employment law that, barring exceptional circumstances, the maximum severance period an employee can expect to receive upon dismissal tops out at 24 months. Ontario’s Court of Appeal has reaffirmed this point time and again (including in 2006, 2016 and 2019).

Last month, the Court of Appeal revisited the question of what circumstances merit a longer than usual severance award in Currie v. Nylene Canada Inc., 2022 ONCA 209. This case involved a 58-year-old employee who had 40 years of service at the time of her dismissal. Having reviewed the matter, the Court of Appeal confirmed that a severance period of 26 months was warranted.

In particular, the Court of Appeal was struck by the employee’s “unique circumstances.” These included:

  1. Currie had left high school at age 18 to work for Nylene Canada and remained there for her entire career;
  2. Currie’s long tenure and age at the time of dismissal;
  3. Currie’s work experience was limited to a very narrow field (fiber production operation) and her skills were not easily transferrable;
  4. Currie had limited computer competency, leading the trial judge to conclude that her odds of finding new employment in the modern job market was slim; and
  5. the cumulative effect of Currie’s age, limited education, and specialized skills transformed her dismissal into what was effectively a “forced retirement.”

The Currie decision reaffirms that something extra is needed to justify severance in excess of 24 months. Long service (25 years or more) and old age (60 years or more) are not enough. Instead, it was the additional factors related to Currie’s service with a single employer, lack of transferrable skills, and computer limitations that allowed the Court of Appeal to confirm a 26-month severance award.

When assessing severance periods, both employers and employees must avoid the temptation to only look at the narrow criteria of age, position, and tenure. The factors that can impact the length of severance may be as varied as workers themselves. Consider the following cases where Ontario courts determined that exceptional circumstances existed to justify long severance awards:

DecisionAgeServiceJob TitleExceptional Circumstance(s)Notice Period
Dussault v. Imperial Oil Limited, 2018 ONSC 116863 years old and 57 years old39 years and 36 yearsReal Estate Development Manager and Territory ManagerExperience limited to a single employer; difficult to transfer unique job skills26 months
Mikelsteins v. Morrison, 2018 ONSC 695257 years old31 yearsDirector of Business DevelopmentExperience limited to a single employer; difficult to transfer unique job skills; marketability limited by non-solicitation obligation26 months
Keenan v. Canac Kitchens Ltd., 2016 ONCA 7963 years old and 61 years old32 years and 25 yearsDelivery and Installation LeadersExperience limited to a single employer; acted as the “public face” of company for entire career26 months
Baranowski v. Binks Manufacturing Co., 2000 CanLII 22614 (ON SC)54 years old29 yearsCompany PresidentPromised job security until retirement30 months

As can been seen from the above chart, there is ample case law to support the 26-month severance period confirmed in Currie. Indeed, long service with a single employer, rendering a worker’s skills difficult to transfer, is one of the most common “exceptional circumstances” recognized by Ontario courts.

Takeaway

Employers should take comfort that severance awards of more than 24 months are still quite rare. Few employees will have the necessary mix of old age, very long service, and something extra to qualify. The easiest way to reduce dismissal related liabilities, however, remains the use of written employment contracts. It is similarly vital to have such contracts regularly reviewed by legal counsel to ensure they remain up to date with current judicial guidance. To do otherwise risks that, one day, your business may face a claim premised on “exceptional circumstances.”  

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Vey Willetts LLP
Employment and labour lawyers at Vey Willetts
Vey Willetts LLP is an Ottawa-based workplace law firm, serving individuals and employers across Eastern Ontario. They recognize that operating a business is complex and maintaining an efficient and legally-compliant workplace is a continuous challenge. The firm helps simplify legal workplace obligations so that employers can focus on what matters: their business. Learn more about Vey Willetts LLP by contacting Andrew Vey, or Paul Willetts or by visiting the firm’s website.
Follow me
Latest posts by Vey Willetts LLP (see all)
  • Equity compensation and effective communication of adverse terms - January 13, 2023
  • When is forty minutes too much? - December 16, 2022
  • Process matters: understanding the procedural duty to accommodate - November 18, 2022

Article by Vey Willetts LLP / Employment Standards, Payroll / Dismissal, employment law, notice period, older long service employees, severance, termination Leave a Comment

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Vey Willetts LLP

Vey Willetts LLP is an Ottawa-based workplace law firm, serving individuals and employers across Eastern Ontario. They recognize that operating a business is complex and maintaining an efficient and legally-compliant workplace is a continuous challenge. The firm helps simplify legal workplace obligations so that employers can focus on what matters: their business. Learn more about Vey Willetts LLP by contacting Andrew Vey, or Paul Willetts or by visiting the firm’s website.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy