• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 24th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference 📣
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Human Rights / Free speech v. discrimination: When workplace rules cross the line

By Andrew Lawson | 2 Minutes Read August 24, 2010

Free speech v. discrimination: When workplace rules cross the line

emailAn employee distributes this email message among your workers:

“Any person engaging in homosexuality offends Almighty God and will spend eternity burning in hell.”

As an employer, can you:

  • ● Tell the employee to stop?
  • ● Discipline this employee?
  • ● Fire this employee for cause?

What if you just ignore the message? What about free speech? Freedom of religion?

If you discipline the employee who sent this email message you may be discriminating on the basis of that employee’s religion, and this is against the law. A workplace rule or demand may be illegal if it has a negative effect on an employee because of their religion—UNLESS you can prove that the rule against or demand to stop spreading such messages is considered a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR). That is, the rule is needed for the smooth operation of your business.

A BFOR is legitimate when:

  • It is rationally connected to the performance of a worker’s job
  • It is adopted in good faith and necessary for a work-related purpose and
  • It would be an undue hardship on the employer to accommodate the individual involved in the behaviour

The recent case of Friesen v. Fisher Bay Seafood and others, 2009 BCHRT 1 is a great example.

A fish processing employer in British Columbia told a supervisor that he had to stop “preaching” his religious beliefs to his co-workers. The supervisor continued to “preach” after being asked to stop. The supervisor was fired and filed a complaint with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal claiming he was discriminated against because of his religious beliefs.

There was no dispute that the only reason for the employee’s termination was his refusal to stop preaching during his work hours. The employee established that he was sincere in his beliefs that his religious practice required him to preach at any time. He believed that, “if you don’t preach people will never know what Jesus Christ is about”.

However, the tribunal agreed with the employer that this rule was a BFOR. The rule helped to maintain an environment where all employees’ beliefs were respected. Workplace rules must protect all of your employees’ interests and contribute to the smooth operation of your business.

However, be mindful to treat all employees with respect and make sufficient attempts to accommodate their religious beliefs. This will go a long way in assisting an employer in defending such necessary rules, in addition to demonstrating that the employer’s duty to accommodate has been fulfilled.

Andrew Lawson
Health and Safety/Human Rights Advisor, Learn Don’t Litigate
www.learndl.ca

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Andrew Lawson
Trainer and advisor at Learn Don't Litigate
Andrew Lawson is a human rights and health and safety trainer and advisor, currently consulting to both the federal and Ontario governments. Since 1996, he has conducted extensive legal research in the areas of human rights and occupational health and safety law. He has worked in the people management business for over 25 years.
Follow me
Latest posts by Andrew Lawson (see all)
  • Responding to a human rights complaint - September 5, 2012
  • Ontario policy on competing human rights - August 8, 2012
  • What does the case of Trayvon Martin tell us about racism in Canada? - April 4, 2012

Article by Andrew Lawson / Human Rights / BFOR, bona fide occupational requirement, discipline, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, firing, Free speech, Freedom of religion, Friesen v. Fisher Bay Seafood and others, policies and procedures, preaching at work, religion, religion in the workplace, religious beliefs, termination, workplace rules

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Andrew Lawson

Andrew Lawson is a human rights and health and safety trainer and advisor, currently consulting to both the federal and Ontario governments. Since 1996, he has conducted extensive legal research in the areas of human rights and occupational health and safety law. He has worked in the people management business for over 25 years.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy