• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Employee Relations / Even in the absence of a release, employee who accepted a termination package not entitled to additional damages

By Alison J. Bird | 2 Minutes Read March 11, 2013

Even in the absence of a release, employee who accepted a termination package not entitled to additional damages

If an employee negotiates a termination package with an employer but does not sign a release, can they successfully claim additional pay in lieu of notice in a court action? Interestingly, the Ontario Superior Court recently held that the answer for one employee in these circumstances was “no”.

In Bland v Canadian Farm Insurance, 2012 ONSC 3021, Bland was terminated without cause after fifteen months of service. At the time of his termination, Bland earned a base salary of $80,000, had a company car allowance and had health and dental benefits. Following his dismissal, the employer offer to provide him with four weeks’ pay in lieu of notice. The employee asked the employer to extend his health and dental benefits for six weeks and the employer agreed. The employer also decided to pay him six weeks’ pay in lieu of notice rather than four weeks. The employee accepted this termination package without objection. Nine months later, he claimed he was entitled to additional damages as a result of wrongful dismissal.

The employer argued that the parties had reached a settlement of Bland’s wrongful dismissal claims and, as a result, he was not entitled to any damages. The Court accepted this argument because the employee had engaged in negotiations with respect to the termination package and it was reasonable to conclude that the employer would not have advanced the payment or extended the benefits if Bland had not agree to settle his claim for wrongful dismissal.

While this case provides some comfort to employers, it should not be seen as setting out a blanket principle that a termination package without a release will bar a wrongful dismissal action. This case should be viewed in its context: a negotiated termination package for a short service employee. Employers would be well advised to obtain releases when settling a former employee’s wrongful dismissal claim, particularly in circumstances where the potential damages could be significant.

Alison Bird
Lawyer
Cox & Palmer

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Alison J. Bird
Employment Lawyer at Cox & Palmer
Alison Bird is a lawyer practicing in Halifax with the Atlantic regional law firm, Cox & Palmer. Alison is growing her practice in the areas of labour & employment law and litigation. Alison is a frequent presenter on employment law topics and recently presented on the challenges being faced by employers dealing with changing demographics in the workplace.
Follow me
Latest posts by Alison J. Bird (see all)
  • Termination clauses: Importance of clear language - November 7, 2016
  • Human Rights Commission tackles racial profiling - September 12, 2016
  • Court of Appeal overturns finding that respondent must admit discrimination to settle a human rights complaint - July 11, 2016

Article by Alison J. Bird / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Payroll / absence of a release, additional damages, additional pay in lieu of notice, Bland v Canadian Farm Insurance, damages, Employee does not sign a release, employee negotiates a termination package, Emplyment law, fifteen months of service, Notice of termination, Ontario Superior Court, pay in lieu of notice, release, settlement, terminated without cause, termination, termination package, terminations, wrongful dismissal

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About Alison J. Bird

Alison Bird is a lawyer practicing in Halifax with the Atlantic regional law firm, Cox & Palmer. Alison is growing her practice in the areas of labour & employment law and litigation. Alison is a frequent presenter on employment law topics and recently presented on the challenges being faced by employers dealing with changing demographics in the workplace.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2022 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy