Misconduct amounted to just cause but did not disallow termination notice

March 30, 2011 Christina Catenacci Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources

Image: mybindi.typepad.com

A recent Ontario case dealt with an employee’s misconduct that clearly amounted to just cause for termination. The employee breached many company rules and pursuant to the progressive discipline policy, the employee should have been terminated. However, the employee was still entitled to receive termination and severance pay based on his 17.5 years of employment.

Why?

Because his misconduct did not constitute “wilful misconduct, disobedience or wilful neglect of duty” pursuant to Ontario Regulation 288/01.

Subsection 2(1)(3) of Ontario Regulation 288/01 lists employees who are not entitled to notice of termination (or termination pay in lieu of) under the Employment Standards Act. Included on the list are employees who have been guilty of wilful misconduct, disobedience or wilful neglect of duty that is not trivial and has not been condoned by the employer.

Likewise, subsection 9(1)(6) of the Regulation lists employees who are not entitled to severance pay under the Act, including those who have been guilty of wilful misconduct, disobedience or wilful neglect of duty that is not trivial and has not been condoned by the employer.

In this case, since the employee’s misconduct was clearly unintentional carelessness, attitude problems and that he did not take the consequences of his actions very seriously when he breached company rules, it was not wilful and did not disallow termination notice or pay. That is why the Ontario Superior Court of Justice found that the employee was entitled to termination and severance pay.

So what does this mean for employers? Make sure if you are trying to claim that an employee is exempt from receiving termination and severance pay under Ontario Regulation 288/01 for wilful misconduct, you must show that the misconduct was intentional and reckless, not just careless.

Christina Catenacci
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Editor

• About
• Latest Posts

Follow me

Christina Catenacci

Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, was called to the Ontario Bar in 2002 and has since been a member of the Ontario Bar Association. Christina worked as an editor with First Reference between February 2005 and August 2015, working on publications including The Human Resources Advisor (Ontario, Western and Atlantic editions), HRinfodesk discussing topics in Labour and Employment Law. Christina has decided to pursue a PhD at the University of Western Ontario beginning in the fall of 2015. Read more

Follow me

Latest posts by Christina Catenacci (see all)

• Mandatory data breach reporting – a message from the Privacy Commissioner of Canada - November 5, 2019
• Recent study regarding gender gaps – the effects of pay transparency - October 1, 2019
• Federal Court of Appeal dismisses Air Canada pilots’ appeal regarding mandatory retirement at age 60 - September 3, 2019

breach of company rules, employee misconduct, employment law, employment standards act, just cause, misconduct, ontario, policy, progressive discipline, Regulation 288/01, Severance pay, termination, termination notice, termination pay, wilful misconduct, wilful neglect of duty, wilful or reckless conduct

Slaw: AODA era part III: Information and communication standard Individual privacy in the workplace – a case precedent