• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
You are here: Home / Employment Standards / Getting your ducks in a row: Warnings before a just cause dismissal 

By SpringLaw | 3 Minutes Read August 9, 2023

Getting your ducks in a row: Warnings before a just cause dismissal 

just cause dismissal

A common question we regularly field from employers during consultations for terminations is whether the employee has behaved badly enough to warrant a dismissal for cause and whether they really need to provide the employee with a termination package.

We can’t fault employers for asking. After all, poorly performing employees or employees engaged in harmful misconduct towards their colleagues are a big problem for employers. Usually, it takes the employer time, money and potentially some action to address the harmful behaviour of the employee in the workplace before the employer is truly ready to consider termination. With all that’s been invested, paying a badly behaved employee, especially one whose behaviour is inappropriate, malicious, or unaligned with the values of the company, can be a tough pill to swallow.

A failure to warn may mean a failure to establish cause

A recent case from New Brunswick serves as an important reminder to employers that a termination for cause can quickly unravel when an employer fails to get its ducks in a row before terminating for cause. In 2023 NBKB 065, the Court found that the behaviour of the Employee, if properly brought to his attention, and not corrected by the Employee, would have ‘easily’ amounted to just cause for dismissal. However, in light of the Employer’s failure to warn the Employee that further incidences of misconduct could result in dismissal for just cause, the Court found that the Employer had not met the burden of establishing cause and awarded the Employee a 7-month reasonable notice period.

There are some rare instances in which a single act of misconduct is sufficiently serious to warrant immediate termination for cause without warning. However, in most cases, employers should be careful to document, discipline (where appropriate), and warn employees that future acts of misconduct can lead to discipline and when appropriate termination for cause. Here are a few important tips when approaching a potential termination for a cause:

  1. Don’t rely on your mental running list: We’ve spoken to countless employers who seem to have a mental running list of all the bad behaviour exhibited by a particular employee over the last several months (or years!). Without proper warnings, that list is effectively meaningless. As soon as possible following an incident of misconduct, it’s critical that employers conduct a thorough and fair investigation into incidents of misconduct. Notes from disciplinary meetings (including verbal warnings) should be detailed and stored along with copies of any disciplinary written warnings issued to the employee. In case it’s not obvious from the above, the letter should include a warning regarding the consequences of continued misconduct.
  2. Issue a final warning: The final warning needs to come before the ‘last straw’ and the employee must be aware that this is the final warning. The employer must provide the employee with sufficient opportunity to improve their conduct before the final warning is acted upon and it’s best to avoid relying on especially minor incidents as the final event before termination.

Leaving emotions and considering a practical route

Ultimately, it’s critical that an employer leave emotions aside and think practically about the termination. While feelings of frustration are completely understandable along with the often present financial constraints associated with a termination package, it’s important to understand the time and costs associated with a just cause dismissal and the potential outcomes of a claim for wrongful dismissal. It could take months to build a sufficient record to establish a just cause. In the meantime, the employee may continue to cause disruption to the workplace costing the company time and money. In the end, there is no guarantee that a court would agree that the actions truly constitute just cause, leaving the employer in a situation likely more costly than proceeding to a without-cause termination from the get-go. 

In the end, if just cause is the only option, make sure you have your ‘warning ducks’ in a row before terminating. 

By Tiffany Thomas

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
SpringLaw
Employment and Labour Law Firm at SpringLaw
SpringLaw is a virtual Canadian boutique law firm, practicing exclusively in the areas of employment, labour and human rights law. We work with a wide range of employers - from global companies with operations in Canada to local owner-operators and start-ups - advising on the wide range of legal issues that arise out of the workplace, particularly workplaces in the tech and creative space. We also provide legal and strategic advice to employees throughout their employment journey. Blog posts are written by Lisa Stam, Hilary Page, Emily Siu, Danielle Murray, Lindsay Koruna, Jessyca Greenwood, Marnie Baizley, Matt Chapman, Evaleen Hellinga and Tiffany Thomas.
Follow me
Latest posts by SpringLaw (see all)
  • Tech at termination: Can I read my employee’s email after they leave? - September 14, 2023
  • Getting your ducks in a row: Warnings before a just cause dismissal  - August 9, 2023
  • Mastering the Competition Act changes - July 18, 2023

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Mastodon

Article by SpringLaw / Business, Employment Standards, Payroll / dismissal for cause, employee misconduct, employment law, just cause, just cause dismissal, Just cause termination, poor performance, reasonable notice period, termination, Termination process, wrongful dismissal Leave a Comment

The Essential HR Policy Guide Banner

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About SpringLaw

SpringLaw is a virtual Canadian boutique law firm, practicing exclusively in the areas of employment, labour and human rights law. We work with a wide range of employers - from global companies with operations in Canada to local owner-operators and start-ups - advising on the wide range of legal issues that arise out of the workplace, particularly workplaces in the tech and creative space. We also provide legal and strategic advice to employees throughout their employment journey. Blog posts are written by Lisa Stam, Hilary Page, Emily Siu, Danielle Murray, Lindsay Koruna, Jessyca Greenwood, Marnie Baizley, Matt Chapman, Evaleen Hellinga and Tiffany Thomas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy

 

Loading Comments...