• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 24th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference 📣
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

age discrimination

By Devry Smith Frank LLP | 4 Minutes Read December 24, 2019

Denial of employee benefits to working seniors: a charter violation

On May 18, 2018, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario rendered its decision with respect to the issue of whether s. 25(2.1) of the Human Rights Code, when read alongside s. 44 of the Employment Standards Act, 2000, permitted employers to terminate benefits for employees when they turned 65. In Talos v. Grand Erie District School Board, the Tribunal found that such a termination violated s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, because it was a form of age discrimination.

Article by Devry Smith Frank LLP / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Human Rights, Payroll / age discrimination, age discrimination claim, age-based discrimination, discrimination based on age, employment law, health benefits, insurance benefits

By Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD | 6 Minutes Read September 3, 2019

Federal Court of Appeal dismisses Air Canada pilots’ appeal regarding mandatory retirement at age 60

In a decision dated August 9, 2019, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal made by Air Canada pilots regarding their age discrimination claim.

Article by Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Human Rights / accommodation, age discrimination, ageism, Air Canada, Air Canada pilots, bona fide occupational requirement, canadian charter of rights and freedoms, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, discrimination based on age, employment law, mandatory retirement age, mandatory retirement practice, normal age of retirement, Pilot's Association, Vilven and Kelly

By De Bousquet PC Barristers and Solicitors | 2 Minutes Read July 31, 2018

HRTO: Terminating benefit plans for employees 65 and over is unconstitutional

Talos v Grand Erie District School Board involved an employee whose extended health, dental and life insurance benefits were terminated by his employer, Grand Erie District School Board, when he turned age 65, although he continued to work on a full-time basis.

Article by De Bousquet PC Barristers and Solicitors / Employee Relations, Human Rights, Payroll / age discrimination, benefit plans, employment law, group benefit plans, Pensions and Benefits, workplace discrimination based on age

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy