• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 24th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference 📣
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

conviction

By Adam Gorley | 3 Minutes Read September 22, 2014

Police records checks ineffective, invade rights, says civil rights association

Police record checks are a poor tool to assess a candidate's suitability for a job, according to the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. An inaccurate, incomplete or inconsequential record can dissuade employers from hiring good candidates, and present a substantial barrier to employment for perfectly qualified individuals.

Article by Adam Gorley / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Human Rights, Privacy / Canadian Civil Liberties Association, casual police contact, CCLA, conviction, criminal offence, criminal records, criminal records checks, identifiable risk to public safety, mental health, non-conviction, pardon, past criminal conviction, police records, qualified candidate, record check policy, suitable candidate, unpardoned conviction, unproven allegations, vulnerable clients, vulnerable sector

By Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD | 3 Minutes Read September 6, 2013

Fine increased in Metron OHS criminal negligence causing death case

As you may recall, charges under both the Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Criminal Code of Canada were laid against the company Metron for the death of four workers at a Toronto construction site when they fell from a scaffold that did not use proper fall arrest systems. A fifth worker was seriously injured. Metron was convicted under the Criminal Code provisions that make it a criminal offence to direct a worker to perform a task without taking reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to a worker. The trial judge fined the company $200,000 plus the Victim Fine Surcharge of 15 percent or $30,000. The Crown appealed and argued that the fine was manifestly unfit...

Article by Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD / Health and Safety, Payroll / absence of a maximum fine, Bill C-45, canadian employment law, conviction, Court of Appeal, criminal code, criminal negligence causing death, direct a worker to perform a task without taking reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that worker, employment law, fatalities, fine, maximum sentence, Metron, occupational health and safety act, offence, OHS criminal negligence causing death, OHSA, scaffold, sentencing, serious offence, Victim Fine Surcharge

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy