First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Posts Tagged ‘mandatory retirement’

Mandatory retirement ends for federally regulated employers

Monday, January 16th, 2012

The federal government gave royal assent to Bill C-13, Keeping Canada’s Economy and Jobs Growing Act on December 15, 2011. Several of the measures enacted have an impact on employment law for federally regulated workplaces. One of the measures amends the Canadian Human Rights Act to eliminate the mandatory retirement age for federally regulated employees.

Read the rest of this post »

Tags: age, age discrimination, age-based job requirement or qualification, anti-harassment and anti-discrimination policies, BFOR, Bill C-13 Keeping Canada’s Economy and Jobs Growing Act, bona fide occupational requirement, Canadian Human Rights Act, duty to accommodate, employment law, federally regulated employers, mandatory retirement, The normal age for retirement in Canada is 65, The Supreme Court of Canada, workplace policies
Posted in Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Human Resources, Human Rights | Make a Comment »

Mandatory retirement has been eliminated − is anyone listening?

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

Old habits die hard. The Human Resources industry is obviously having a hard time abandoning the notion that 65 is the accepted age for retirement. Since amendments to the Ontario Human Rights Code in 2006, employers are prohibited from discriminating against employees based solely on age. Prima facie compelling retirement at age 65 is a breach of the Code.

Read the rest of this post »

Tags: 65 is the accepted age for retirement, age, age discrimination, bona fide occupational requirement, discrimination, employment law, human rights code, Human rights complaint, human rights tribunal, mandatory retirement, retirement at age 65, Workplace policy
Posted in Employee Relations, Human Resources, Human Rights | Make a Comment »

The Air Canada pilots’ mandatory retirement saga – will it end with the tribunal’s third decision?

Friday, August 26th, 2011

In July, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal made its third decision in the case of two Air Canada pilots who challenged the airline’s mandatory retirement policy. The tribunal decided in favour of Air Canada. Then, in August, the tribunal decided in a similar case involving 70 other Air Canada pilots. The tribunal again decided in favour of the airline, but for different reasons. For those hoping the July decision would settle the matter once and for all, the August decision is sure to confuse matters.

Read the rest of this post »

Tags: accommodation, Air Canada, Air Canada pilots, bona fide occupational requirement, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, discrimination based on age, duty to accommodate, employment law, Federal Court, mandatory retirement, undue hardship
Posted in Human Resources, Human Rights, Union Relations | Comments Off

Is mandatory retirement really mandatory?

Tuesday, January 18th, 2011

Section 15.1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter) provides that “every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on…age.”

Read the rest of this post »

Tags: Air Canada, bona fide occupational requirement, canadian charter of rights and freedoms, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Charter rights, discrimination, employment law, federally regulated industries, forced retirement, mandatory retirement, normal retirement age, retirement policy
Posted in Human Resources, Human Rights | Make a Comment »

Air Canada pilots must be reinstated after forced retirement

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010

The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has ordered Air Canada to reinstate two pilots, aged 65 and 67, who were forced to retire at age 60.

Read the rest of this post »

Tags: age discrimination, Air Canada, Air Canada pilots, canadian employment law, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Charter, collective agreement, discrimination, discrimination based on age, employment law, Federal Court of Canada, forced retirement, mandatory retirement, mandatory retirement provisions, reinstatement
Posted in Human Resources, Human Rights, Union Relations | Make a Comment »

Hearings scheduled to decide retirement ages of Air Canada pilots

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Between November 22 and November 25, 2010, the Federal Court of Canada will hold hearings and then decide whether the mandatory retirement age of 60 years should stand for about 3,000 Air Canada pilots.

Read the rest of this post »

Tags: 60 years, age, age of retirement, Air Canada, canadian charter of rights and freedoms, Canadian Human Rights Act, discrimination, equality, Federal Court of Canada, mandatory retirement, mandatory retirement policy, Pilot's Association, pilots, retirement age
Posted in Human Resources, Human Rights | Make a Comment »

Mandatory retirement still a working issue for employers

Friday, March 19th, 2010

A brief analysis of Nilsson v. UPEI, one of the most recent cases on mandatory retirement and human rights discrimination based on age.

Read the rest of this post »

Tags: bona fide requirement, discrimination based on age, human rights, human rights act, human rights code, mandatory retirement, mandatory retirement policy, Prince Edward Island
Posted in Human Resources, Human Rights | 1 Comment »

An aging workforce: mandatory retirement (Part II)

Monday, February 8th, 2010

Across Canada, mandatory retirement has been all but completely phased out. Recently, all Canadian jurisdictions in Canada, except for federally regulated workplaces, have enacted legislation to amend their human rights laws and end the practice of mandatory retirement at age 65. This means…

Read the rest of this post »

Tags: aging workforce, canadian human rights law, human rights act, human rights code, human rights law, human rights legislation, mandatory retirement
Posted in Human Resources, Human Rights | Make a Comment »

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (8)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design