accommodation process

Accommodation and when employees don’t engage in the process

December 9, 2016 Lisa Stam, Spring Law Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Union Relations

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) released a very important development on family status discrimination, in a case that intersects with disability accommodation law. In Misetich v Value Village Stores, the tribunal reviewed the caselaw, including the Federal Court of Appeal’s Johnstone case, and clarified its test for accommodating family status requests in the workplace.

accommodating family status, accommodation, accommodation process, Disability, disability accommodation law., discrimination, employment law, family status, family status test, Johnstone case, Johnstone test, Misetich v Value Village Stores, undue hardship

Discriminatory grounds such as family status, age, marital status, etc. that deal with the duty to accommodate

August 30, 2016 Rubin Thomlinson LLP Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights

The Ontario Human Rights Code lists a number of personal characteristics protected from discrimination: race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, record of offences, marital status, family status or disability. These personal characteristics are often referred to as “protected grounds”. An employer is prohibited from discriminating against an employee on the basis of any protected ground.

accommodation process, direct discrimination, discrimination in employment, discriminatory grounds, duty to accommodate, employment law, human rights code, indirect discrimination, protected grounds, protection from discrimination, request for accommodation

It takes two to tango: Superior Court rules on employees’ duty to facilitate in the accommodation process

May 13, 2016 Stringer LLP Accessibility Standards, Conferences, Employee Relations, Human Resources, Human Rights, Integrated Accessibility Regulation, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Standard for Employment, Union Relations, Wages and Compensation

Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to work of employees who require disability-related accommodation. An important aspect of this duty is procedural, i.e. the steps taken to search for a reasonable accommodation. Even if an employer ultimately cannot accommodate without undue hardship, failure to engage in the procedural aspect of the duty to accommodate is a violation of the Human Rights Code.

17th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference, accommodating employees with disabilities, accommodation process, disability-related accommodation, duty to accommodate, employment law, human rights code, human rights damages, long-term absence from work

To IME or not to IME, this is the question

December 18, 2015 Simon Heath, BA, MIR, LLB, Heath Law Accessibility Standards, Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Integrated Accessibility Regulation, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Standard for Employment, Union Relations, Wages and Compensation

In the recent decision, the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal (“OHRT”) addressed the issue of when it would be reasonable for an employer to request an Independent Medical Exam (“IME”) from an employee during the accommodation process. The OHRT ruled that an employer request for an IME will be justified when it was “reasonable” in the circumstances of creating an individualized accommodation plan.

accommodation process, disability leave, doctor's note, doctor’s medical evidence, duty to accommodate, employment law, family doctor, human rights code, IME, Independent Medical Exam, individualized accommodation plan, medical information, policies and procedures

The limits on the duty to accommodate

June 15, 2015 Stringer LLP Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights

A recent case from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario provides guidance to employers on the extent of the duty to accommodate.

accommodation process, discriminated against on the basis of disability, discrimination, duty to accommodate, essential duties of the position, failed to provide reasonable accommodation to the point of undue hardship, human rights tribunal, limits on the duty to accommodate

Doctor’s note not always a ticket to a successful human rights claim

January 21, 2015 Devry Smith Frank LLP Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Union Relations

When I was in high school and university, it was not uncommon for a few of my classmates to fall ill during exams or just prior to a major test. When explaining to the teacher the next day why they were not present to write the test, one of the more common responses from the teacher would be, “Bring a doctor’s note.”

accommodation process, discrimination based on disability, doctor's note, duty to accommodate, employee leave of absence, employment law, health difficulties, human rights claim, Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, illness, medical information, medical leave, undue hardship

No procedural duty to accommodate

November 19, 2014 Devry Smith Frank LLP Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll

The Federal Court of Appeal recently ruled in Canada Human Rights Commission v Attorney General of Canada and Bronwyn Cruden, that employers do not have a separate procedural duty to accommodate employees and any procedural inadequacy throughout the accommodation process is not critical where the employer’s actions do not constitute discrimination.

accommodation process, Canada Human Rights Commission, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, federal court of appeal, investigate a complaint, Meiorin, monetary penalty, Ontario Human Rights Code, Supreme Court of Canada, undue hardship

Employee who lied about ability to work justly fired

June 26, 2014 Christina Catenacci Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Union Relations, Wages and Compensation

An Ontario labour arbitrator upheld an employee’s termination for just cause after the employer learned that the employee faked the severity of her injury and ability to perform work for over five years. The arbitrator found that the employer was justified in terminating the employee for just cause because the actions of the employee went to the heart of the employment relationship.

ability to perform work, accommodation, accommodation needs, accommodation process, Disability, disciplinary record, duty to accommodate, Employee dishonesty, Employee who lied about ability to work, employment law, employment relationship, grievance, human rights code, Labour Law, termination, termination for just cause, union

Three of the most popular articles this week on HRinfodesk

April 17, 2014 Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll

Three of the most popular articles this week on HRinfodesk deal with three accommodation on the ground of disability.cases badly handled by employers.

accommodation process, accommodation request, assumptions about employee disability, British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Disability, duty to accommodate, employee disability, employment law, en’s Day, gender-exclusive event, HRinfodesk, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, Physical disability, retaliation, return her to work, time off work

Accommodating scent sensitivities in the workplace

October 12, 2012 Stringer LLP Employee Relations, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Human Rights, Union Relations

Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of scent sensitivities arose in a recent decision of the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal (the “Tribunal”). It raises questions as to what is considered undue hardship when accommodating an employee with a sensitivity to scents.

accommodation, accommodation process, duty to accommodate, employee handbook, Employees with disabilities, employment law, exposure to any scents, fragrance-free policy, human rights code, Labour Law, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, policy manual, scent sensitivity, scent-free or fragrance-free policy, undue hardship

Duty to accommodate disability case sent back to Human Rights Tribunal

September 16, 2011 Christina Catenacci Human Resources, Human Rights

The tribunal that decided the case of alleged discrimination against a part-time paramedic with multiple sclerosis who was shifted to a part-time ambulance driver position (at the paramedic’s pay rate) left some loose ends, according to the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The Court sent the case back to the tribunal to decide if the employer reasonably accommodated the employee, even though he was not able to perform important paramedic duties.

accessibility, accommodation process, assistive devices, assistive technologies, BFOR, Disability, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, human rights tribunal, multiple schlerosis, paramedic, Physical disability, resonably accommodated employee, Supreme Court of British Columbia, undue hardship

What are the employee’s obligations in the accommodation process

March 1, 2011 Earl Altman Human Resources, Human Rights

The Ontario Human Rights Code provides for a variety of prohibitions against discrimination on stated grounds, including disability. However, the Code goes on to specify “a right of a person under this code is not infringed for the reason only that the person is incapable of performing or fulfilling the essential duties or requirements attending the exercise of the right because of disability”. Reading through the legalese, what this means is that it is not a prohibited act of discrimination to deny an employee a job for the reasons that his disability prevents him from performing that job. However, the Code goes on to provide that a person cannot be found incapable of performing the duties of his position if it is possible for the employer to accommodate his particular needs “without undue hardship”.

accommodate disabilities, accommodation process, complaint of discrimination, Disability, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, human rights code, human rights tribunal, prohibited act of discrimination, reasonable accommodation, Supreme Court of Canada, undue hardship