Maciel vs. Fashion Coiffures

Maciel vs. Fashion Coiffures: pregnancy and employer’s continued obligation under the “Code”

March 30, 2016 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Wages and Compensation

The applicant alleged that she was terminated when on her first day of work she disclosed to her manager, Ms. Cinzia Conforti, that she was pregnant. In contrast, the respondents attributed her termination to the applicant’s alleged request to work part-time, although she had been newly hired for a full-time position.

74 of Dodds v. 2008573 Injury to Dignity, compensation, damages, discrimination, discrimination on the grounds of sex, Dismissal, duty to accommodate, Employment Insurance (“E.I.”) maternity benefits, employment law, employment relationship, Faryna v. Chorney, feelings and self-respect, Human Rights code of Ontario, Human Rights Legal Support Centre, human rights remedies, human rights training, In ADGA Group Consults Inc. v. Lane, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano Human Rights Paralegal Toronto, Maciel vs. Fashion Coiffures, maternity leave, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Commission’s (“OHRC”), Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, policies and procedures, pregnancy, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Remedy for Future Compliance, termination, the Human Rights Code, Wage and Benefits Loss