human rights remedies
March 30, 2016 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Wages and Compensation
The applicant alleged that she was terminated when on her first day of work she disclosed to her manager, Ms. Cinzia Conforti, that she was pregnant. In contrast, the respondents attributed her termination to the applicant’s alleged request to work part-time, although she had been newly hired for a full-time position.
74 of Dodds v. 2008573 Injury to Dignity, compensation, damages, discrimination, discrimination on the grounds of sex, Dismissal, duty to accommodate, Employment Insurance (“E.I.”) maternity benefits, employment law, employment relationship, Faryna v. Chorney, feelings and self-respect, Human Rights code of Ontario, Human Rights Legal Support Centre, human rights remedies, human rights training, In ADGA Group Consults Inc. v. Lane, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano Human Rights Paralegal Toronto, Maciel vs. Fashion Coiffures, maternity leave, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Commission’s (“OHRC”), Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, policies and procedures, pregnancy, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Remedy for Future Compliance, termination, the Human Rights Code, Wage and Benefits Loss
September 29, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Accessibility Standards, Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Integrated Accessibility Regulation, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Standard for Employment, Wages and Compensation
The applicant, Michele Macan, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to employment due to disability. The respondent, Stongco Limited Partnership, rejected the allegations, instead submitting that the applicant’s disability was “not a reason, a factor, or even considered in its decision to terminate the applicant”.[1] The respondent alleged that her termination was […]
Disability, discrimination, Dismissal, duty to accommodate, duty to accommodate an employee with a disability, employment law, Failure to accommodate, HR Law, human rights remedies, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano human Rights, lost income, Macon v. Strongco, Michele Macan, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, paralegal, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Sambrano Legal Services, Strongco Limited Partnership, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code, undue hardship
August 26, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll
While more often than not the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario’s decisions are not challenged, there are two processes by which this can be done.
ancestry, Big Inc. cob Le Papillon on the Park, Big Inc. v. Islam, colour, creed, Danielle Bigue, employment law, ethnic origin, human rights remedies, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano human Rights, lost income, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, place of origin, prohibited grounds of discrimination, race, Sambrano Legal Services, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code, willsay statement
July 29, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Recruiting and Hiring
Generally speaking, res judicata (Latin for “a thing adjudicated”) is the legal doctrine which prevents the same matter from being tried a second time once there has been a verdict or decision in regard to that matter. Under Ontario’s Human Rights Code, a criminal matter being decided in regard to a matter that contains a breach of the Human Rights Code does not necessarily prevent an applicant from filing at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. This was the case in G.G. v. […] Ontario Limited.
G.G. v. […] Ontario Limited, harassment, Human right paralegal toronto, human rights remedies, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano human Rights, lost income, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Sambrano Legal Services, sex, sexual harassment, sexual harassment in the workplace, sexual solicitation, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code, Tribunal remedies
June 22, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Recruiting and Hiring, Training and Development
A recent Ontario Human Rights case further underscores the employer’s ongoing duty to accommodate to the point of undue hardship, and that Code based harassment or discrimination constitutes a breach under the Human Rights Code of Ontario.
2252466 Ontario Inc. o/a The Ground Guys, age, ancestry, British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU, colour, Disability, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, harassment, human rights remedies, human rights training, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano human Rights, lost income, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, poisoned work environment, prohibited grounds of discrimination, race, Sambrano Legal Services, sex, sexual orientation, termination, the Human Rights Code
April 9, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services HR Analytics, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Rights, Training and Development
The recent Human Rights decision of Rollick v. 1526597 Ontario Inc. o/a Tim Horton’s Store No. 2533, addresses what the Tribunal characterized as “heavy handed and unjustifiable” conduct on the part of the employer, when dealing with an employee with a disability.
discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, heavy handed, human rights remedies, human rights training, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano human Rights, lost income, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, perceived disability, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Rollick v. 1526597 Ontario Inc. o/a Tim Horton’s Store No. 2533, Sambrano Legal Services, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code, Tim Horton's
February 23, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Accessibility Standards, Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Integrated Accessibility Regulation, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Standard for Employment, Training and Development, Wages and Compensation
The human rights case of Emra v. Impression Bridal Inc. reminds us that a disability may be hidden, but when brought to the employer’s attention, it should not be ignored
ADD, anxiety, Disability, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, Emra v. Impression Bridal Ltd., Human Rights Legal Support Centre, human rights remedies, human rights training, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano human Rights, lost income, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, paralegal, perceived disability, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Sambrano Legal Services, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code
January 27, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Recruiting and Hiring, Wages and Compensation
In the summer of 2013 the applicant, Amanda Lugonia, began a new job at the same time she discovered she was starting a new family, the result of which was instant dismissal from her new employer. The respondent denied that the applicant’s pregnancy was a factor in the termination of her employment and in addition denied knowledge of the pregnancy, claiming the reason for her termination was due to lack of “fit”.
discrimination, employment law, human rights remedies, human rights training, inference of discrimination, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano, Lugonia v. Arista Homes, maternity leave, monetary awards, Ontario human rights commission, paralegal, pregnancy, prohibited grounds of discrimination, sex based discrimination, short-term contracts, short-term employment contracts, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code
December 23, 2014 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Recruiting and Hiring, Training and Development, Wages and Compensation
Following a verbal altercation with his supervisor, the applicant was terminated after he refused to partake in an anger management program as a requirement of his continued employment. On October 31, 2008 the applicant filed an application with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario alleging discrimination based on race. The respondents, Knoll, denied the allegations.
Adams v. Knoll North America, anger management, anti-Black racism, discrimination, EAP, Employee Assistance Plan, employment law, HRCO, hrto, human rights remedies, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano, Knoll, monetary awards, Ontario human rights commission, paralegal, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Racial Stereotyping, racialization, racism, termination, the Human Rights Code
November 28, 2014 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll
The case of Smith v. The Rover’s Rest, 2013 HRTO 700 is a recent case dealing with sexual harassment and reprisal under the Human Rights Code of Ontario. At the time of the incidents, the applicant, Debbie Smith was a 39-year-old mother being paid $7.00 per hour as a bartender at the Rover’s Rest in […]
Bruce Doman, Deborah Smith, depression, discrimination, employment law, HRCO, hrto, human rights remedies, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano, monetary awards, non-monetary remedies, Ontario human rights commission, paralegal, prohibited grounds of discrimination, public interest remedies, reprisal, sexual advancement, sexual harassment, small businesses, Smith v the Rover's Rest, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code, The Rover's Rest, workplace harassment
Which is more practical, absolutely no office romance policy or allowed but need to disclose? IMO, the need to disclose, while accommodating, complexity and unnecessary... – Dec 15, 1:39 PM
Ageism is a big problem in the legal community. Bay Street firms and others are not interested in applicants' skills, knowledge, etc. unless they are... – Nov 16, 11:05 AM
