vexatious comment or conduct
Landmark decision gives insight into workplace harassment and employer reprisal
October 21, 2011 David Hyde Employee Relations, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Human Rights
The Ontario Labour Relations Board has provided what some believe to be the most significant legal interpretation yet of workplace harassment and employer reprisal in the context of the recently enacted Bill 168 amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA). The case, Conforti v. Investia Financial Services Inc., 2011, was decided on September 23, 2011.
Bill 168, compliance, discipline, employment law, harassing email, occupational health and safety act, OHSA, ontario, reprisal, right to refuse work, risk assessment, termination, termination for cause, termination for harassment complaint, vexatious comment or conduct, whistleblowing, workplace harassment, workplace harassment investigation, workplace violence
Search
Recent Comments
-
Expanded citizen's arrest law and the Canadian workplace
David Hyde Hi Corey, There are a number of legal considerations and precedents on citizen's arrest that need to be navigated and this is not the forum... – Jun 05, 4:21 PM
-
CIC announces proposed changes to the definition of 'dependent children'
Lourdes I hope and pray that immigration officials should consider the situation of live- in caregivers who are already here before January 1, 2014 but who... – May 30, 4:29 PM
-
Court of Appeal hints that right to strike may be protected by the Constitution
Christina Catenacci Hi John, Thanks for your comment. Check out paragraph 67 of the decision: "Accordingly, none of what I have written above is to suggest or... – May 22, 4:38 PM
- Generated by BWP Recent Comments.
Connect with us
Blogroll
- Stringer HR Blog
- Human Right in the Workplace
- Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
- All About Information
- Slaw
- Law of Work
- Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
- QuIRC PeopleInsight
- McCarthy Tétrault Ontario Employer Advisor blog
- McCarthy Tétrault British Columbia Employer Advisor blog
- MacLeod Law Firm Blog
- Clear Path Employer Services Blog
Categories
- Accessibility Standards (92)
- Announcements (31)
- Conferences (23)
- Human Resources (983)
- Corporate Immigration (73)
- Employee Relations (344)
- Employment/Labour Standards (320)
- Health and Safety (234)
- HR Analytics (34)
- HR Policies and Procedures (103)
- HRMS (42)
- Human Rights (281)
- International HR Law (2)
- Privacy and Security (95)
- Recruiting and Hiring (130)
- Training and Development (67)
- Union Relations (95)
- Payroll (213)
- International Payroll (1)
- Pensions and Benefits (117)
- Source Deductions and Reporting (54)
- Wages and Compensation (121)
Archive
Posts by author
- Alison J. Bird(15)
- Amery Boyer(14)
- Clear Path Employer Services(13)
- Adam Gorley(119)
- Alan McEwen(11)
- Andrew Lawson(56)
- Andrew Taillon(22)
- Christina Catenacci(134)
- Colin Braithwaite(2)
- David Hyde(19)
- Doug Macleod(2)
- Employer Advisor, McCarthy Tétrault LLP(1)
- Earl Altman(47)
- Occasional Contributors(22)
- Henry J. Chang(59)
- Ian J Cook(21)
- John Proctor(6)
- Lauren Bride(6)
- Maanit Zemel(1)
- Marcia Scheffler(16)
- Michele Glassford(13)
- Matt Lalande(9)
- Suzanne Cohen Share(20)
- Simon Heath(11)
- Stuart Rudner(43)
- Stringer LLP(13)
- Yosie Saint-Cyr(345)











Could you be liable for workplace violence? Ontario’s OHSA says so
June 8, 2012 Clear Path Employer Services Health and Safety, Human Resources, Training and Development
Imagine a situation where your employee is seriously injured by an outside party…
Share this:
Bill 168, duty to investigate, failing to ensure immediate assistance, liability of directors of the corporation, occupational health and safety act, OHSA, Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, Partners in Prevention, vexatious comment or conduct, workplace harassment, workplace investigation, workplace violence, workplace violence and harassment policy