• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 24th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference 📣
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

human rights tribunal

By McCarthy Tétrault LLP | 3 Minutes Read April 4, 2017

Reasonable settlement offer prevents litigious complainant from proceeding

A recent decision of the BC Human Rights Tribunal serves as a useful reminder of the utility of a reasonable settlement offer, which can result in the Tribunal putting an end to complaint proceedings without a hearing.

Article by McCarthy Tétrault LLP / Employee Relations, Human Rights, Union Relations / accommodation, accommodation of disability, Disability, discrimination based on disability, employment law, human rights code, Human rights complaint, human rights tribunal, reasonable settlement offer, Sebastian v. Vancouver Coastal Health and others (No. 3), settlement offer

By Devry Smith Frank LLP | 4 Minutes Read August 24, 2016

Workplace accommodation has limits

In Pourasadi v Bentley Leathers Inc., the Human Rights Tribunal found that accommodating a store manager by permitting the employee not to assist customers was not required, since assisting customers was an essential duty of her position.

Article by Devry Smith Frank LLP / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Health and Safety, Human Rights, Union Relations / accommodation policy, childcare obligations accommodation, duty to accommodate, employer's duty to accommodate, employment law, Family Status Accommodation, human rights code, human rights tribunal, mental illness accommodation, point of undue hardship, Pourasadi v Bentley Leathers Inc., religious accommodation, undue hardship, Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, wsib

By Cristina Lavecchia | < 1 Minutes Read June 9, 2016

Three popular articles this week on HRinfodesk

The three popular articles this week on HRinfodesk deal with:An Ontario human rights case where an employee’s dismissal by her employer for having lied about when she found out about her pregnancy was ruled to be non-discriminatory; a decision that clarifies that the duty to mitigate does not apply when an employer terminates a fixed-term employment contract before its end date; and an FAQ that looks at an employee who is looking for accommodation to care for their child because they cannot afford daycare.

Article by Cristina Lavecchia / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Human Rights / accommodation on the basis of family status, accommodation policy, contractual damages, discrimination, duty to mitigate, employment contract, employment law, employment standards, firing pregnant employee, fixed-term contracts, human rights code, Human rights complaint, human rights tribunal, labour relations, Terminating a fixed-term contract early, workers compensation, Workplace discrimination

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy