• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 24th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference 📣
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

lump-sum payment

By Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor | < 1 Minutes Read November 29, 2012

Most-viewed articles this week on HRinfodesk

The three most popular HRinfodesk articles this week deal with proposed amendments to the Canada Labour Code, a vacation deprivation study, and a termination case based on the language of an employment contract..

Article by Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor / Employment Standards, Payroll / Canada labour Code, employment contract, employment law, HRinfodesk, lump-sum payment, salary, termination, termination for cause, Termincation, vacation deprivation, vacation time

By Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation | 3 Minutes Read August 2, 2012

Failure to continue disability coverage during the notice period

Last year, I reminded employers of the danger of failing to continue disability benefits after dismissing an employee and providing pay in lieu of notice. An important case has now passed through the Ontario Court of Appeal...

Article by Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Payroll / Brito v. Canac Kitchens, common-law notice period, contract of employment, Disability, disability coverage, disability insurance, Dismissal, dismissing an employee, employment contract, employment law, employment standards act, employment-related benefits, lump-sum payment, notice of dismissal, notice period, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, pay in lieu of notice, reasonable opportunity to seek new employment, salary and benefit continuance, termination without cause, terminations, working notice

By Earl Altman | 4 Minutes Read November 24, 2011

The fine art of determining notice for dismissal: ‘old habits die hard’

Probably the most prevalent misconception in the area of employment law is the notion that all employees are entitled to "one month per year" as notice of termination without cause. This has, in the past, been referred to as the golden rule. In spite of repeated judicial pronouncements that the rule no longer applies, human resources professionals continue to apply it.

Article by Earl Altman / Employment Standards, Payroll / Bardal Factors, Bardal v. The Globe & Mail, character of employment, Dismissal, economy, employment law, length of employment, length of notice period, lump-sum payment, notice of dismissal, notice period, one month per year, re-employment prospects, salary continuance, specialized knowledge, statutory notice period, termination, termination package, termination without cause, unstable labour market, wrongful dismissal

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy